MQ-9 Reaper vs Elbit Hermes 900

Reaper and Hermes 900 overlap in persistent reconnaissance, but a shared medium-altitude label does not establish the same strike capacity or sensor fit. Reaper provides the heavier armed-surveillance reference; Hermes 900 must be assessed through the equipment and mission package of the operator concerned.

Open these drones in the interactive compare tool

Specifications side by side

MQ-9 Reaper vs Elbit Hermes 900: published specifications
SpecificationMQ-9 ReaperElbit Hermes 900
ManufacturerGeneral AtomicsElbit Systems
Country of originUSAIsrael
Mission roleAttack / ReconnaissanceMulti-Role ISR / Strike
Year introduced20072012
Length11 m8.3 m
Wingspan20 m15 m
Height3.8 m3.2 m
Maximum speed482 km/h220 km/h
Published range1,850 km2,500 km
Endurance27 hours36 hours
Service ceiling15,240 m9,144 m
Payload1,746 kg350 kg
Weight2,223 kg1,180 kg
ArmamentAGM-114 Hellfire, GBU-12/38 JDAM, GBU-49Spike missiles, laser-guided munitions

Figures below come from the linked DroneStrike profiles and retain their configuration qualifiers. Maximum speed, range, endurance and payload are separate published figures, not a single achievable mission configuration. Range is not necessarily combat radius or datalink reach. Missing information is not zero, and a larger figure does not establish combat effectiveness.

The comparison that matters

The useful comparison is a documented sensor-and-weapons configuration, not each aircraft's largest advertised number. Check whether a Hermes example is primarily an ISR aircraft, a maritime adaptation or an armed configuration before treating it as a substitute for an armed Reaper sortie.

Understanding MQ-9 Reaper

Reaper combines persistent surveillance with a substantial cleared weapons capacity. Its larger turboprop airframe supports a different sensor and strike workload from light tactical UAVs, one-way weapons and reconnaissance-only aircraft.

Separate MQ-9A figures from MQ-9B capabilities, and distinguish total payload allowance from a specific cleared weapons and sensor load.

Understanding Elbit Hermes 900

Hermes 900 is a medium-altitude platform associated with persistent multi-sensor intelligence missions. Operator equipment, maritime adaptations and communications packages shape its capability more than the family name alone.

Do not assume an armed, maritime or satellite-linked configuration is standard on every customer's aircraft.

How to read the specification table

The table compares the named MQ-9 Reaper and Elbit Hermes 900 catalog records, not an artificial combination of every advertised upgrade. Values are reproduced with their existing units and qualifications. Where figures describe different missions or payload types, treat them as context rather than calculating an unsupported performance advantage.

A published maximum is not necessarily achievable alongside every other maximum. Endurance may change with equipment, flight or sea conditions and transit requirements; a range figure may describe a different constraint from datalink reach. Unknown specifications remain unknown. For development programs and limited-disclosure systems, an intended capability must stay distinct from a completed trial or operational service.

Frequently asked questions

What is the main difference between MQ-9 Reaper and Elbit Hermes 900?

Reaper and Hermes 900 overlap in persistent reconnaissance, but a shared medium-altitude label does not establish the same strike capacity or sensor fit. Reaper provides the heavier armed-surveillance reference; Hermes 900 must be assessed through the equipment and mission package of the operator concerned.

Can the headline specifications establish a winner?

No. The mission, actual configuration, supported force and quality of evidence determine what the figures mean. Maximum speed, endurance and payload alone do not establish combat effectiveness, survivability or equal intelligence collection.

Where can I verify the versions and figures used here?

Follow the MQ-9 Reaper and Elbit Hermes 900 profile links for full descriptions, timelines and any listed source references. This guide preserves the catalog's uncertainty labels rather than presenting unpublished or weakly sourced figures as independently verified facts.

Sources and further reading

Specifications are drawn from the linked catalog profiles. Source dates and aircraft configurations may differ; see the individual profiles for their timelines and qualifications.

Drone comparison guides