Bayraktar TB2 vs Bayraktar TB3
TB2 and TB3 share a manufacturer and armed-reconnaissance heritage, but TB3 introduces a different aircraft and shipboard operating requirement. The distinction is not simply which number is larger: folding and deck operations affect how a force can launch, recover and support the platform.
Open these drones in the interactive compare tool
Specifications side by side
| Specification | Bayraktar TB2 | Bayraktar TB3 |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Baykar | Baykar |
| Country of origin | Turkey | Turkey |
| Mission role | Reconnaissance / Light Attack | Carrier-Based Strike / ISR |
| Year introduced | 2014 | 2024 |
| Length | 6.5 m | 8.5 m |
| Wingspan | 12 m | 14 m |
| Height | 2.2 m | 2.7 m |
| Maximum speed | 110 KTAS / about 204 km/h (current baseline manufacturer figure) | 260 km/h |
| Published range | Communications and mission dependent; LOS/BLOS configuration varies | 1,850 km |
| Endurance | 18+ hours listed; 27 h 3 min record (manufacturer) | 24 hours |
| Service ceiling | 20,000 ft / about 6,100 m (baseline); turbo test records differ | 8,500 m |
| Payload | 150 kg (current baseline manufacturer figure) | 280 kg |
| Weight | 700 kg MTOW (current baseline manufacturer figure) | 1,450 kg |
| Armament | MAM-L, MAM-C smart munitions, LUMTAS | MAM-L, MAM-C, MAM-T smart munitions |
Figures below come from the linked DroneStrike profiles and retain their configuration qualifiers. Maximum speed, range, endurance and payload are separate published figures, not a single achievable mission configuration. Range is not necessarily combat radius or datalink reach. Missing information is not zero, and a larger figure does not establish combat effectiveness.
The comparison that matters
Compare baseline land-based TB2 use with the particular TB3 deck configuration being discussed. Carrier trials, completed landings and sustained operational availability are different claims. A larger published payload should not be treated as proof of equivalent endurance with that load aboard.
Understanding Bayraktar TB2
TB2 combines reusable reconnaissance with light precision attack. Its relatively small weapons and sensor allowance places it in a different class from heavy armed UAVs even when both are described as combat drones.
Keep baseline TB2 data separate from TB2T-AI test records, record-setting flights and customer-specific communications configurations.
Understanding Bayraktar TB3
TB3 develops the armed-reconnaissance concept around shipboard operation and a different airframe. Deck handling, launch and recovery requirements are important parts of the comparison, not simply secondary accessories.
A shipboard test, a demonstrated landing and routine fleet capability are different milestones. Do not treat all carrier-related claims as operational proof.
How to read the specification table
The table compares the named Bayraktar TB2 and Bayraktar TB3 catalog records, not an artificial combination of every advertised upgrade. Values are reproduced with their existing units and qualifications. Where figures describe different missions or payload types, treat them as context rather than calculating an unsupported performance advantage.
A published maximum is not necessarily achievable alongside every other maximum. Endurance may change with equipment, flight or sea conditions and transit requirements; a range figure may describe a different constraint from datalink reach. Unknown specifications remain unknown. For development programs and limited-disclosure systems, an intended capability must stay distinct from a completed trial or operational service.
Frequently asked questions
What is the main difference between Bayraktar TB2 and Bayraktar TB3?
TB2 and TB3 share a manufacturer and armed-reconnaissance heritage, but TB3 introduces a different aircraft and shipboard operating requirement. The distinction is not simply which number is larger: folding and deck operations affect how a force can launch, recover and support the platform.
Can the headline specifications establish a winner?
No. The mission, actual configuration, supported force and quality of evidence determine what the figures mean. Maximum speed, endurance and payload alone do not establish combat effectiveness, survivability or equal intelligence collection.
Where can I verify the versions and figures used here?
Follow the Bayraktar TB2 and Bayraktar TB3 profile links for full descriptions, timelines and any listed source references. This guide preserves the catalog's uncertainty labels rather than presenting unpublished or weakly sourced figures as independently verified facts.
Sources and further reading
- Bayraktar TB2: full catalog profile, timeline and source notes
- Bayraktar TB3: full catalog profile, timeline and source notes
Specifications are drawn from the linked catalog profiles. Source dates and aircraft configurations may differ; see the individual profiles for their timelines and qualifications.