Bayraktar Kızılelma vs YFQ-44A Fury
Kızılelma and YFQ-44A Fury are uncrewed jet developments with different national program and integration contexts. Their comparison is primarily about mission objectives, basing requirements and verified development milestones rather than publicly settled performance figures.
Open these drones in the interactive compare tool
Specifications side by side
| Specification | Bayraktar Kızılelma | YFQ-44A Fury |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Baykar Defense | General Atomics Aeronautical Systems |
| Country of origin | Turkey | United States |
| Mission role | Carrier-Capable Strike / Air Superiority / Deep Penetration | Collaborative Combat / Air-to-Air / Strike / EW |
| Year introduced | 2023 | 2024 |
| Length | 14.0 m | 13.5 m |
| Wingspan | 10.0 m | 9.0 m |
| Height | 3.0 m | 3.1 m |
| Maximum speed | 944 km/h (Mach 0.9) | Mach 1.4+ |
| Published range | 930 km | 700+ nm |
| Endurance | 5+ hours | 6+ hours |
| Service ceiling | 12,000 m | 50,000 ft |
| Payload | 1,500 kg | 900 kg (internal bay) |
| Weight | 6,000 kg (MTOW) | 3,500 kg |
| Armament | Internal bay: 2× Roketsan SOM cruise missiles or precision bombs; external hardpoints: up to 1,000 kg additional ordnance including MAM-L, HGK, TEBER smart kits | 2–4 AIM-120 AMRAAM or GBU-53/B StormBreaker in internal bay; electronic warfare payload option |
Figures below come from the linked DroneStrike profiles and retain their configuration qualifiers. Maximum speed, range, endurance and payload are separate published figures, not a single achievable mission configuration. Range is not necessarily combat radius or datalink reach. Missing information is not zero, and a larger figure does not establish combat effectiveness.
The comparison that matters
A proposed carrier, air-to-air or collaborative mission is not the same as a fielded capability. Identify which aircraft and software configuration has been demonstrated. Do not infer a signature, range or weapons advantage when the relevant comparable data is not publicly disclosed.
Understanding Bayraktar Kızılelma
Kızılelma is a jet-powered uncrewed combat-aircraft program rather than a simple enlargement of TB2. Its intended missions involve a different flight regime and development path from persistent propeller-driven armed surveillance.
Separate prototypes, intended carrier operation and proposed combat roles from capabilities demonstrated and fielded in a specified configuration.
Understanding YFQ-44A Fury
YFQ-44A Fury is an Anduril collaborative combat-aircraft development. Its role is best understood through program requirements and demonstrated mission-system integration, not through unverified comparisons of classified or unpublished performance.
Separate aircraft development milestones, software trials and future procurement intentions from confirmed fielded capabilities.
How to read the specification table
The table compares the named Bayraktar Kızılelma and YFQ-44A Fury catalog records, not an artificial combination of every advertised upgrade. Values are reproduced with their existing units and qualifications. Where figures describe different missions or payload types, treat them as context rather than calculating an unsupported performance advantage.
A published maximum is not necessarily achievable alongside every other maximum. Endurance may change with equipment, flight or sea conditions and transit requirements; a range figure may describe a different constraint from datalink reach. Unknown specifications remain unknown. For development programs and limited-disclosure systems, an intended capability must stay distinct from a completed trial or operational service.
Frequently asked questions
What is the main difference between Bayraktar Kızılelma and YFQ-44A Fury?
Kızılelma and YFQ-44A Fury are uncrewed jet developments with different national program and integration contexts. Their comparison is primarily about mission objectives, basing requirements and verified development milestones rather than publicly settled performance figures.
Can the headline specifications establish a winner?
No. The mission, actual configuration, supported force and quality of evidence determine what the figures mean. Maximum speed, endurance and payload alone do not establish combat effectiveness, survivability or equal intelligence collection.
Where can I verify the versions and figures used here?
Follow the Bayraktar Kızılelma and YFQ-44A Fury profile links for full descriptions, timelines and any listed source references. This guide preserves the catalog's uncertainty labels rather than presenting unpublished or weakly sourced figures as independently verified facts.
Sources and further reading
- Bayraktar Kızılelma: full catalog profile, timeline and source notes
- YFQ-44A Fury: full catalog profile, timeline and source notes
Specifications are drawn from the linked catalog profiles. Source dates and aircraft configurations may differ; see the individual profiles for their timelines and qualifications.