Bayraktar Kızılelma vs ANKA III
Kızılelma and ANKA III are Turkish jet-powered uncrewed combat-aircraft programs from different manufacturers and design approaches. Their external layouts and proposed mission roles differ, but neither appearance nor the word stealth supplies a measured radar-signature comparison.
Open these drones in the interactive compare tool
Specifications side by side
| Specification | Bayraktar Kızılelma | ANKA III |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Baykar Defense | Turkish Aerospace Industries |
| Country of origin | Turkey | Türkiye |
| Mission role | Carrier-Capable Strike / Air Superiority / Deep Penetration | Strike / ISR / Loyal Wingman |
| Year introduced | 2023 | 2023 |
| Length | 14.0 m | 7.9 m (manufacturer claim) |
| Wingspan | 10.0 m | 12.5 m (manufacturer claim) |
| Height | 3.0 m | 2.5 m (manufacturer claim) |
| Maximum speed | 944 km/h (Mach 0.9) | 425 kt / Mach 0.7 at 30,000 ft (manufacturer claim) |
| Published range | 930 km | Not publicly disclosed |
| Endurance | 5+ hours | 10 h at 30,000 ft (manufacturer claim) |
| Service ceiling | 12,000 m | 40,000 ft (manufacturer claim) |
| Payload | 1,500 kg | 1,200 kg (manufacturer claim) |
| Weight | 6,000 kg (MTOW) | 6,500 kg MTOW (manufacturer claim) |
| Armament | Internal bay: 2× Roketsan SOM cruise missiles or precision bombs; external hardpoints: up to 1,000 kg additional ordnance including MAM-L, HGK, TEBER smart kits | Internal and external precision-guided munitions; test configurations vary |
Figures below come from the linked DroneStrike profiles and retain their configuration qualifiers. Maximum speed, range, endurance and payload are separate published figures, not a single achievable mission configuration. Range is not necessarily combat radius or datalink reach. Missing information is not zero, and a larger figure does not establish combat effectiveness.
The comparison that matters
Use documented flights and named payload or teaming tests to distinguish demonstrated progress from intention. Keep Kızılelma's carrier-related plans separate from ANKA III's flying-wing design context, and do not combine proposed capabilities into an assumed operational configuration.
Understanding Bayraktar Kızılelma
Kızılelma is a jet-powered uncrewed combat-aircraft program rather than a simple enlargement of TB2. Its intended missions involve a different flight regime and development path from persistent propeller-driven armed surveillance.
Separate prototypes, intended carrier operation and proposed combat roles from capabilities demonstrated and fielded in a specified configuration.
Understanding ANKA III
ANKA III is a jet-powered flying-wing combat-aircraft development. Its low-observable design intent and proposed teaming missions belong to a different category from the propeller-driven Anka-S reconnaissance system.
Design intent is not measured radar signature, and a development flight is not proof of a completed operational weapons or teaming capability.
How to read the specification table
The table compares the named Bayraktar Kızılelma and ANKA III catalog records, not an artificial combination of every advertised upgrade. Values are reproduced with their existing units and qualifications. Where figures describe different missions or payload types, treat them as context rather than calculating an unsupported performance advantage.
A published maximum is not necessarily achievable alongside every other maximum. Endurance may change with equipment, flight or sea conditions and transit requirements; a range figure may describe a different constraint from datalink reach. Unknown specifications remain unknown. For development programs and limited-disclosure systems, an intended capability must stay distinct from a completed trial or operational service.
Frequently asked questions
What is the main difference between Bayraktar Kızılelma and ANKA III?
Kızılelma and ANKA III are Turkish jet-powered uncrewed combat-aircraft programs from different manufacturers and design approaches. Their external layouts and proposed mission roles differ, but neither appearance nor the word stealth supplies a measured radar-signature comparison.
Can the headline specifications establish a winner?
No. The mission, actual configuration, supported force and quality of evidence determine what the figures mean. Maximum speed, endurance and payload alone do not establish combat effectiveness, survivability or equal intelligence collection.
Where can I verify the versions and figures used here?
Follow the Bayraktar Kızılelma and ANKA III profile links for full descriptions, timelines and any listed source references. This guide preserves the catalog's uncertainty labels rather than presenting unpublished or weakly sourced figures as independently verified facts.
Sources and further reading
- Bayraktar Kızılelma: full catalog profile, timeline and source notes
- ANKA III: full catalog profile, timeline and source notes
Specifications are drawn from the linked catalog profiles. Source dates and aircraft configurations may differ; see the individual profiles for their timelines and qualifications.